Comments on: Everyone is a Porn Star

By: zondi

zondi — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:02:51 +0000

just fyi the distinction made in porn as compared to prostitution, is that the person paying the star/actress/actor/whatever, is not the same person who is having sex with her/him, so it is not considered prostitution

By: fitz

fitz — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:23:07 +0000

Jim,
Right on man! You hit the nail on the head. Rhea is one of those people, and their are millions like her, that do not think about what they are saying. But you sir, you are one of the few, the proud, the thinkers. Let’s hope intelligence is contagious.

By: JiM

JiM — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:56:42 +0000

Sometimes the simplest observations are the boldest. This prostitution vs. pornography matter has bothered me quite a bit too. The absurdity and hypocrisy is mind boggling. Nice to see it put so bluntly and with such a big cigarette.

And Rhea, you’ve got it backwards. What you describe is the situation BECAUSE it is illegal – that is not WHY it is illegal. Prohibition doesn’t work. We tried it with alcohol and we got the mob, bathtub gin that could blind a man and back-ally bars that were better suited for a stabbing than for having a cold drink. Now that we’ve come to our senses we have regulated distribution, Guinness and Applebee’s.

By: fitz

fitz — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:13:07 +0000

Josh – we need people like you in politics. You think outside the box!

By: Josh

Josh — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:16:04 +0000

Anybody who frequents prostitutes would be wise to carry a nice video camera, a tripod, and some lights in the back of their car. Then, if they get busted, just claim it’s all part of a porn film, and/or a documentary about prostitution. Even the prostitute, who may be unaware of your “scam”, would be wise to go along with it and confirm to the cop that she is indeed taking part in the video production.

By: fitz

fitz — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:07:41 +0000

Frank – I was being half serious and half sarcastic. I like your idea better to be honest. It IS definitely time for the oldest profession to get a makeover legally. You would think with the amount of sex that politicians have with prostitutes that the laws would have been changed years ago.

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:43:43 +0000

I didn’t sense any sarcasm here, mainly because I have made the same argument myself. I am pro-legalization when it comes to prostitution, because it is easier keeping prostitutes from being beaten or employed at too young an age if there is a legal framework to it. Prostitutes are beaten because they have no recourse, what are they going to do, go to the cops?

So yes, I’ve made this same argument, although in my version of course the client would KEEP the tapes. The video does not have to be released for it to be legally filming a porn movie you know, and I believe a lot of clients would prefer to keep their anonymity.

By: fitz

fitz — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:53:43 +0000

Joker – I agree……it is a big cigarette.

Did you sense my sarcasm there???

By: Joker

Joker — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:26:20 +0000

1) Sarcasm is easy to grasp over the internet.

2) That’s a big fucking cigarette.

By: fitz

fitz — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:01:32 +0000

Rhea I think you missed the point of the post. I know sarcasm is hard to convey over the internet but I kinda felt like it was obvious in this case. But, you get points for reading the whole article. If I had tshirts or any kind of merchandise I would send it to you as a gift but I don’t so instead i am sending you positive thoughts.